$ 15.99 · 4.6 (129) · In stock
In late January, Thinx, Inc. announced that it had reached a $5 million settlement agreement to end Dickens v. Thinx, Inc., a class action perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS/PFOA) lawsuit. Thinx will provide up to $5 million to reimburse consumers who bought the company’s signature period underwear between November 12, 2016 and November 28, 2022. To put this in perspective, reimbursements are limited to $7.00 per pair (up to 3 pairs) for consumers who still have receipts and $3.50 per pair (same limit) for those who do not. The initial purchase price of these undies runs up to $35.00 per pair.
Toxic chemicals in period underwear? What to know as U.S.-based Thinx settles lawsuit - National
PFAS in period underwear: The Thinx scandal – Mme L'Ovary
Thinx PFAS Lawsuit Also Calls Attention to Nanosilver Concerns - Women's Voices for the Earth
Thinx Product Safety Standards, Third Party Testing
We Had 44 Period and Incontinence Products Tested for Forever Chemicals. Many Were Contaminated.
PFAS in clothing: What you need to know
Thinx Settles Class-Action Lawsuit: Here's What You Need To Know About PFAS, Nation
What to Know About the Thinx Class-Action Settlement
What to know about PFAS after Thinx underwear settles class-action lawsuit - Good Morning America
We Had 44 Period and Incontinence Products Tested for Forever Chemicals. Many Were Contaminated.
Australian period underwear makers deny using 'forever chemicals' after Thinx settles suit in US, PFAS
Thinx lawsuit: What to know about the settlement and PFAS exposure : NPR
What to know about PFAS after Thinx underwear settles class-action lawsuit - Good Morning America